The Traditional Form Problem

Digital forms were supposed to save us from paper. And they did - kind of. But they introduced their own set of problems, especially for field workers.

Traditional Form Apps: The Pain Points

1. Typing on Mobile is Slow

Studies show that typing on a mobile device is 3-4x slower than on a desktop keyboard. For field workers who fill out multiple reports per day, this adds up to hours of lost productivity.

2. Context Switching is Expensive

When you're inspecting a piece of equipment, every time you look down at your phone to type, you lose focus. You have to:

• Stop what you're doing


• Switch mental context to the form


• Find the right field


• Type your observation


• Switch back to the task

This constant switching is exhausting and error-prone.

3. One-Size-Fits-All UX

Most form apps show you all fields at once, or force you through a rigid sequence. Neither approach works well when reality doesn't match the form's assumptions.

4. No Natural Language Understanding

Type "BP 120/80" and a traditional form has no idea what you mean. You have to find the blood pressure field, tap it, enter 120, tap another field, enter 80.

---

How Voiz Report is Different

Speed: 3x Faster Report Completion

Speaking is naturally faster than typing. But the real speed gain comes from not having to navigate the form at all.

With Voiz Report:

• Say "Blood pressure 120 over 80, pulse 72, temperature 98.6"


• All three fields are populated in one sentence


• No tapping, no scrolling, no field hunting

Eyes-Free Operation

Keep your focus on the task. Whether you're:

• Inspecting equipment with both hands


• Walking through a job site


• Examining a patient

You can document without looking at your screen.

Natural Corrections

Made a mistake? Just say "Actually, the temperature was 99.2" - no need to:

• Find the field


• Clear the old value


• Enter the new one

The app understands corrections in natural language.

Intelligent Guidance

The the app doesn't just transcribe - it guides. If you miss a required field, it asks. If something sounds unusual, it confirms. It's like having a smart assistant helping you complete the report.

---

Side-by-Side Comparison

| Feature | Traditional Forms | Voiz Report |
|---------|-------------------|-------------|
| Input method | Typing/tapping | Voice |
| Avg completion time | 8-12 minutes | 2-4 minutes |
| Eyes-free capable | No | Yes |
| Hands-free capable | No | Yes |
| Natural language | No | Yes |
| Intelligent guidance | No | Yes |
| Custom templates | Usually limited | Unlimited |
| Works with gloves | Difficult | Yes |

---

When Traditional Forms Still Make Sense

To be fair, voice isn't always the best choice:

• Noisy environments where voice recognition struggles
• Sensitive contexts where you can't speak out loud
• Complex data entry like financial numbers with many decimals

For these cases, traditional forms remain useful. But for the majority of field reporting scenarios, voice is simply faster and more natural.

---

The Bottom Line

Traditional form apps digitized paper forms. Voiz Report reimagines the entire data collection experience around how humans naturally communicate.

The question isn't whether voice reporting will replace typed forms - it's how soon your team will make the switch.

---

Ready to see the difference? Try Voiz Report free and complete your first report in under 2 minutes.